you're reading...
Franken v. Coleman, POLITICS

Coleman v. Franken: Supreme Court Documents Due May 15

Minnesota Supreme Court Justices

Minnesota Supreme Court Justices

On Monday, April 20, Norm Coleman filed an appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court in an effort to overturn recount results – and a court decision – which found Al Franken the winner of the Senate race.

Franken’s attorneys filed a motion on April 21 requesting that Coleman’s arguments and documents be presented to the Minnesota Supreme Court by May 4 in the interest of expediency and for the sake of underrepresented Minnesotans. Today, the motion was denied and the court ordered that Coleman has until May 15 to file related documents and the case will be heard beginning June 1, 2009.

Although officially a nonpartisan body, the Minnesota Supreme Court weighs heavy on the republican side. The five judges who will hear the case are Justices Alan Page, Paul Anderson, Lorie Gildea, Helen Meyer and Christopher Dietzen. Pawlenty appointees Chief Justice Eric Magnuson and Justice G. Barry Anderson have recused themselves from the case citing their involvement in the recount. Justice Lorie Gildea contributed directly to the 1998 Coleman campaign but has not recused herself. Similarly, Justice Christopher Dietzen made a $500 contribution to Coleman’s Senate campaign. He has not, as of yet, recused himself either. Again, state supreme courts are nonpartisan but Dietzen and Gildea’s actions will undoubtedly be under scrutiny, as was Secretary of State Mark Ritchie’s during the recount process. Ritchie is a democrat whose conduct during the recount has proved to be impeccably nonpartisan:

“The Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State and election officials throughout Minnesota’s counties and cities are well-trained, fair, and conscientious and performed their duties admirably. Minnesota could not conduct elections without the hard work and diligence of its dedicated professional and citizen volunteers, and the Court is proud of their service.”                   – State of Minnesota Second District Court, April 13, 2009

Back on November 5, 2008 no winner was declared in this race and a recount was generated automatically in accordance with Minnesota election law. Even so, Coleman asked Franken to give him the race in an effort to “begin the healing process.” Almost six months later with Franken having been repeatedly found to be the winner in this race and a majority of Minnesotans (including one-third of Coleman’s supporters) believing he should concede, Coleman continues to fight.

See: MPR, MinnPost, Aurora, MN Progressive Project


3 thoughts on “Coleman v. Franken: Supreme Court Documents Due May 15

  1. Shouldn’t there be similar scrutiny on Justices Alan Page and Helen Meyer?

    Although Justice Page did not campaign actively against Norm Coleman in 2002, he let his name be circulated as one of the top political challengers to Coleman in Octoberm 2002 after Senator Wellstone’s plane was lost. Ultimately, the DFL party selected former Vice President Walter Mondale instead of Justice Page. That was too bad for the DFL, because Alan Page is the number one, number two, and number three all-time vote getter in Minnesota in his three challenged runs for the Minnesota Supreme Court.

    You might also note that Justice Meyer was a major donor against Norm Coleman when she made major contributions to Senator Wellstone in 2001.

    Posted by mort squint | 28 April, 2009, 9:23 am


  1. Pingback: 4/25-PCW Extra: The Coleman/Franken Feud « Political Championship Wrestling - 25 April, 2009

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: