//
you're reading...
Franken v. Coleman, POLITICS

Franken v. Coleman: Daily Updated Recount Tally

16 December 2008:

With Coleman leading by fewer than 200 votes in an unfinished race, the Minnesota State Canvassing Board begins reviewing challenged ballots December 16. Secretary of State Mark Ritchie hopes to conclude the count by December 19, however, with the matter of incorrectly rejected absentee ballots unsettled at this point, this goal may not be realistic.

Counties were given the authority to accept the incorrectly rejected ballots but the Coleman campaign has filed litigation to block this procedure. State law dictates that in a race this close, as many ballots as possible should be allowed into a (re)count to insure that the majority of voters’ intentions are taken into consideration.

The number of challenged ballots to be reviewed has been reduced to approximately 1,500 (500 challenged by Franken, 1,000 challenged by Coleman). Although the challenged ballots have been made available online through this link, viewers should understand that there could be markings unseen on the online photographs that could render a ballot invalid should the Canvassing Board judge validity as well as voter intent. 

—————————————————————————————————

Percentage of Ballots Recounted: 99.93%
Percentage of Precincts Recounted: 99.98 %

Franken recounted votes as of 5 December 2008: 1,207,657 (as of 4 November 2008: 1,210,285)
Coleman recounted votes as of 5December 2008: 1,208,344 (as of 4 November 2008: 1,210,995)

Ballots challenged by Franken campaign as of 5 December 2008: 3,280
Ballots challenged by Coleman campaign as of 5 December 2008: 3,375

VIEW THE CHALLENGED BALLOTS HERE.

Coleman is leading by 687 votes with 1 precinct left to count. There are 6,655 challenged ballots (excluding the challenges withdrawn by the Franken campaign and a large number of challenges that are expected to be drawn by the Coleman campaign). Additionally, there are 131 missing ballots from Ward 3 Precinct 1.

Each of the  6,655 challenged ballots could be rendered invalid, returned to the candidate for whom they were first counted or could go to the other candidate. Deputy Secretary of State Jim Gelbmann gave the campaigns until the end of the day Wednesday, Dec. 3 to advise him as to which challenges they intend to withdraw. The Franken campaign stated its intention to withdraw  at least 633 of its challenged ballots. The Coleman campaign said it “is willing to withdraw challenges,” but has yet to do so and has missed the deadline set by the Off ice of the Secretary of State. 

Franken’s net gain: 23 votes (excluding challenged and missing ballots)

Source: MN Secretary of State
(Results not official until verified by the State Canvassing Board)

Additional Recount News:

*December 3: The Franken campaign will withdraw 633 of its challenged ballots and could withdraw even more according to lead recount attorney, Marc Elias. The Coleman campaign said it “is willing to withdraw challenges,” but has yet to take any steps in that direction.

December 2: Franken gained a net 37 votes after 171 uncounted ballots were found stuck in a machine in Maplewood’s 6th District. The Secretary of State’s office has requested an explanation as to how the votes were missed.

On November 26, the State Canvassing Board denied the Franken campaign’s request to include rejected absentee ballots in the recount. However, County Boards were given the option to include rejected absentee ballots at their discretion. It is still unclear whether some rejected absentee ballots will be counted or not.

Also see: Citizens for Election Integrity – MN and MN Progressive Project

Discussion

5 thoughts on “Franken v. Coleman: Daily Updated Recount Tally

  1. Nice blog! Talk about going down to the wire…it’ll be interesting to see exactly who emerges as the victor here.

    http://ontheseventhday.wordpress.com/

    Posted by oo12oo | 20 November, 2008, 11:03 pm
  2. Thanks for the blogroll link and comments! (We moved our site to Blogspot).

    You make a good point about remaining aware of the dueling unknowns of Coleman’s lawsuits and Franken’s absentee advocacy. In addition to the tallying of challenged ballots following the recount.

    The disputed-ballots evaluation process should be placed on prime-time television, with ESPN-style scoreboard graphics providing a running tally. Coleman and Franken should be seated in the auditorium, as the shots alternate between the counts and the hopefuls’ immediate reactions.

    Posted by Matthew Wintergarden | 21 November, 2008, 1:46 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: 2008 ELECTION RESULTS: MINNESOTA « The Raabe Review - 20 November, 2008

  2. Pingback: Franken v. Coleman: Recount Update « The Raabe Review - 25 November, 2008

  3. Pingback: Franken v. Coleman: Make that Coleman v. Franken (Franken Wins, Coleman Sues) « The Raabe Review - 12 January, 2009

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: